By Mickey Scornavacco | MickeyX3.com
Lake County residents should stop pretending Eric Rinehart is just a neutral prosecutor calling balls and strikes.
He is not.
He is an elected Democratic State's Attorney with a very clear political brand, and that brand is progressive, activist, equity-driven, pro-SAFE-T Act, pro-gun-control, pro-abortion-rights, anti-MAGA, and deeply aligned with the modern left.
That matters.
It matters because the State's Attorney is not just another politician posting slogans on Facebook. He controls the power of prosecution. He decides what cases get charged, what cases get ignored, what gets treated as a misunderstanding, and what gets turned into a felony.
That is why the recent hate-crime case involving pro-ICE, anti-immigration, and MAGA-related posters deserves serious public scrutiny.
Not because anyone has to like the posters. Not because anyone should defend real threats. Not because ugly speech should be celebrated.
But because when a far-left prosecutor's office takes politically offensive speech from the right and tries to convert it into a felony hate-crime case, the public has every right to ask one simple question.
Is this justice, or is this ideology?
According to the Lake County State's Attorney's Office, Derek Webb of Libertyville was charged with one count of hate crime and one count of disorderly conduct after allegedly posting signs that prosecutors claim directly threatened Latino and immigrant members of the community. Reporting on the case says prosecutors focused specifically on bullseye-style signs with the words "Good Shot ICE," not simply the MAGA or pro-ICE signs.
That distinction matters.
If the State can prove a real, direct, legally recognized threat, then present the evidence in court.
But if the real issue is that the message was pro-ICE, anti-illegal-immigration, pro-Trump, MAGA-related, offensive, or politically unacceptable to progressives, then this becomes something much more dangerous.
It becomes viewpoint prosecution.
And that is where Rinehart's public ideology becomes impossible to ignore.
Rinehart's own political record puts him squarely on the progressive left. His campaign messaging has focused on equity, racial disparities, implicit-bias training, immigration-related prosecution reforms, reduced fines and fees, and ending vehicle civil forfeiture. He has publicly supported the SAFE-T Act and cashless bail. He has supported abortion-rights politics. He has supported gun-control politics. He has publicly opposed MAGA politics.
His endorsement list tells the same story. Democratic officials. Progressive organizations. Criminal-justice reform groups. Racial-equity groups. Gun-control groups. Abortion-rights groups. The usual suspects of the modern activist left.
That does not automatically make every prosecution from his office illegitimate.
But it does make politically charged prosecutions worthy of scrutiny.
A prosecutor with that public record does not get to charge a MAGA-related, pro-ICE poster case as a hate crime and then act shocked when people question the politics behind it.
The First Amendment does not only protect approved speech. It does not only protect rainbow flags, progressive slogans, preferred pronouns, and activist-approved messaging.
It also protects speech that offends the government.
It protects speech that offends prosecutors.
It protects speech that makes activists furious.
It protects political speech from the right just as much as political speech from the left.
That is the entire point.
Illinois hate-crime law is broad. Disorderly conduct is broad. When those two are combined, prosecutors have a very wide net. And wide nets become dangerous when they are placed in the hands of ideological prosecutors.
Because once the government starts treating offensive political speech as criminal intimidation, the question becomes obvious.
Would the same standard apply in reverse?
Would Rinehart's office bring a hate-crime case if a left-wing activist used violent imagery against Trump supporters?
Would a sign targeting conservatives be treated as a felony?
Would an anti-police poster be prosecuted with the same energy?
Would a sign mocking Christians, Republicans, gun owners, or ICE supporters get this level of attention?
Or would we suddenly hear speeches about protest, activism, satire, context, restorative justice, and the importance of protecting controversial expression?
That is the problem.
The standard cannot depend on whose politics are being attacked.
Equal justice means one standard.
Not one standard for progressive activists and another standard for conservatives.
Not one standard for Pride events and another standard for MAGA signs.
Not one standard for favored groups and another standard for politically disfavored citizens.
If Webb made a real threat, prove it.
If he targeted people with a true threat of violence, prove it.
If this was criminal intimidation and not crude political expression, prove it.
But do not ask the public to ignore the obvious political backdrop.
Eric Rinehart has chosen to make his ideology public. He has campaigned on it. He has branded himself with it. He has aligned himself with it. He has taken endorsements from it. He has wrapped his office in the language of the modern progressive prosecutor movement.
So when his office brings a politically loaded hate-crime case involving immigration, ICE, MAGA, and speech from the right, that ideology is fair game.
This is not about whether people like the posters.
This is about whether the government can turn the wrong political message into a felony.
That should scare every American.
Because today it is a pro-ICE poster.
Tomorrow it could be a Facebook post.
Then a meme.
Then a school board comment.
Then a campaign sign.
Then an op-ed.
That is how free speech dies. Not all at once. It dies when people cheer because the person being prosecuted is someone they already dislike.
The First Amendment was not written to protect comfortable speech. It was written to protect dangerous, offensive, unpopular, and politically inconvenient speech from government punishment.
The State's Attorney's job is to prosecute crimes, not police ideology.
Lake County deserves equal justice.
Not political theater.
Not progressive activism dressed up as prosecution.
Not felony charges because the wrong side offended the right people.
Eric Rinehart's politics are not hidden.
They are in plain sight.
And Lake County voters should be paying attention.
— Mickey Scornavacco, MickeyX3.com
📢 Share This Story
Help spread the truth - share this story with your network!
